recursion - Is Clearcase recursive labelling more efficient than element by element labelling? -


I use recractices with ~ 3700 files on a project. While releasing, there are some directories that have to be labeled repeatedly, the file count is ~ 2400. Files in other directories are selected labels. I currently label files using a script again through a list of files And label the files one by one, it takes about 20 minutes to connect to Ethernet.

Is it useful to label the labeling process for repeated labeling in two parts and one for selective labeling? Is recursive labeling faster than 1x, 2x, ..?

ClearCase action file is always by file .. Slow down!

If you can, then you need to re-apply your label (so if all the files in the given tree need labeling).
It is also a dynamic view to avoid any side effects related to that operation, the update status of a snapshot view (not updated, or updates not in progress)

Results faster (I do not have exact estimates, but at least looks 2x correct).

Warning, your directory on which you consistently apply the label, should be in the correct version (i.e.).


Do not forget that the issue of labeling is to identify a compatible set of files (i.e. a set of files that are developed and labeled as everyone It means that labeling a single file " mklabel -rec " is always better.
A recurring label does not remember any file, the incomplete set of labels placed on files from the list (for example, if the label in the list of files is obsolete or incomplete)

< / Html>

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

python - Overriding the save method in Django ModelForm -

html - CSS autoheight, but fit content to height of div -

qt - How to prevent QAudioInput from automatically boosting the master volume to 100%? -